You already have lead magnet ideas.
You have a note somewhere with four of them. Maybe a doc with twelve.
That was never the bottleneck.
The bottleneck is that a lead magnet idea is worth nothing until it is a finished PDF, sitting behind a page that converts, followed by emails that arrive on their own. That is five assets. Most people finish one and a half.
The Lead Magnet Funnel Builder template finishes all five in one sitting — from a single paragraph about your business.
Claude Code. Its own microVM. Your drafts, your list.
Search "lead magnet ideas" and count what you get
Page one is a wall of listicles. Fifty ideas. Twenty-seven examples. Nine formats that convert.
Notice who publishes them.
Almost every one is written by a company that sells email software, and the post exists to get you into their signup flow. The ideas are real. The gap is structural: they hand you inspiration and leave you the work.
Here is what "the work" actually costs on one funnel.
| Asset | What it takes if you do it yourself |
|---|---|
| Write the magnet | 3–8 hrs (or six weeks of "I'll get to it") |
| Build the opt-in page | 1–3 hrs, plus the temptation to add nine buttons |
| Build the thank-you page | 1 hr, usually skipped, usually costs you the trust |
| Price and sanity-check the first offer | 1–2 hrs of spreadsheet guessing |
| Write six follow-up emails | 4–6 hrs, usually stops at one |
Call it two working days for the first one. That is why most people's list is stuck at the size their newsletter footer earned them.
What actually comes back
You give it one paragraph. Who you serve, what you sell, what pain your customers are trying to escape.
It writes the five parts of the funnel, across thirteen files.
01-lead-magnet.md — the magnet itself, drafted. Not an outline, not a concept: the actual report, the actual checklist, or the word-for-word script if you are recording it. Before it writes, it pitches you five or more hooks and states in one line the curiosity each one triggers. Hooks that cannot pass that test get cut instead of padded.
02-optin-page.html and 03-thankyou-page.html — self-contained pages. Open them in a browser immediately; paste them into whatever builder you already pay for. The thank-you page delivers the magnet unconditionally and offers exactly one next step, because a bait-and-switch at that moment costs you the relationship you just paid for.
04-offer.md — the first offer plus a break-even worksheet built on your real numbers.
05-followup/ — six messages. Instant delivery first, then story, then a quick win, then a bridge. The pitch does not appear until message four.
Three rules every opt-in page it writes has to pass
Most opt-in pages fail for the same three reasons, so the rules are enforced in a file the agent reads before every run.
One message. A headline, an image of the magnet, one form. No navigation, no video, nothing competing for the click.
Real curiosity. The headline and the image together have to make a stranger need to know what is inside. "Learn how to lose weight" fails. A specific claim that sounds slightly impossible passes.
A literal instruction. The page tells the visitor exactly what to do: enter your email and I will send it right away. Opt-in forms have been on the internet for thirty years and people still need to be told.
A draft that violates one of the three gets rewritten before you ever see it.
The math refuses to lie to you
This is the part I would fork it for.
Break-even math on a funnel needs three inputs: what a lead costs you, what your first offer sells for, and what share of leads buy it. Most people know one of those.
Ask a general-purpose model and it will cheerfully invent the other two. That invented number then anchors a real advertising decision.
This agent will not. Unknown inputs render as [UNKNOWN] and get carried visibly through the formula — you see the shape of the calculation with the hole still in it. Industry rules of thumb render as [BENCHMARK], labeled as lore rather than dressed up as your forecast.
Fewer promises. Better decisions.
Nine ways to get the magnet made fast
The template ranks magnet formats by what you already have lying around, not by what sounds impressive.
Three text routes: compile expert contributions into one piece, compile your own case studies and examples under a counted title, or adapt public-domain material for your market with a bridging chapter.
Three audio routes: read your own report aloud, interview an expert your market already trusts, or curate the handful of episodes and posts that actually mattered so nobody else has to dig.
Three video routes: record your screen against an outline, record yourself on a phone against the same outline, or run one workshop and let the first hour be the magnet while the whole thing becomes the offer.
Same content, heavier package, higher perceived value. Often the fastest new magnet is a repackage of something you already published.
A marketing tool that cannot send is the point
Every funnel product on that first search-results page wants to be the thing that sends.
This one has no send path at all.
A rules file ships inside the template: no email sending, no ESP connection, no scheduling, no ad spend. Ask it to hit send and it refuses and points at the rule.
That is a deliberate failure mode. The worst outcome here is that you have drafts you have not shipped yet. The alternative — an agent with your list credentials and a helpful disposition at 3am — is not a trade I would make, and I would not ask you to.
Your list stays yours. Nothing leaves the box without you.
Who this is for
A good fit if you sell something (or plan to) and your list is smaller than your ambition; if you have raw material — posts, case studies, expertise — with no funnel wrapped around it; if you want drafts you own and edit rather than a subscription that holds your pages hostage.
Not a fit if you want the emails sent for you (it refuses on purpose), if you want traffic (this builds the thing that catches demand; it does not buy ads), or if you want a revenue forecast (it shows the formula and labels the assumptions).
Starting
Fork the template. It provisions a real microVM — no free trial, no free tier, and a 30-day money-back guarantee on your first purchase.
Open the terminal, log into Claude Code with your own Anthropic account. That credential stays on your VM and was never part of the template. There is nothing else to configure, because an agent that never sends has nothing to authenticate against.
Then paste your paragraph and read what comes back.